Cursor AI Development Workflows
Endertech uses Cursor as our primary AI-powered IDE to plan, implement, and review software faster. Agents accelerate drafts and refactors. Senior engineers own architecture, risk, and what ships.
Cursor helps when the work is clear enough to assist, and the stakes are high enough that humans still need to decide. Project rules and repo context keep assistance on-pattern.
We encode constraints first, use agents to move faster inside those bounds, then close with tests and human judgment before anything enters production.
Programs Delivered with AI-Accelerated Engineering


When Capacity, Complexity, and Review Pressure Collide
Backlog outruns the team
Multi-file changes everywhere
Integrations and edge cases
Review is the bottleneck
Docs drift from the system
Prototypes need production paths
AI in the IDE, Accountability on the Team
Daily driver IDE
Rules and repo context
Senior review required
Context First, Then Accelerate, Then Verify
Capture constraints
Encode project rules
Implement with agents
Review and ship
Agents, Rules, Refactors, and Review Loops
Agent-assisted implementation
Project rules and AGENTS guidance
Cross-file refactors
Test and checklist drafts
Docs and PR assistance
Tooling and MCP context
Build with Us, or Adopt the Same Discipline
AI-accelerated project delivery
Workflow assessment
Rules and guardrails setup
Ongoing capacity
You can count on us.
Firm Price
The price we quote for a scope of work is the price you pay. No surprises.
Detailed Plan
Visual and written plans make clear the scope of work and guide the project to success.
Steady Cadence
Progress and working decisions arrive on an agreed, dependable rhythm.
Prompt Communication
Questions and issues are acknowledged promptly, with clear ownership and next steps.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Endertech use Cursor?
Cursor is our primary AI-powered IDE for planning, implementation, refactors, tests, and documentation drafts. Agents accelerate first passes across files. Senior engineers own architecture, security, data integrity, and what ships to production.
Does AI write production code without review?
No. Agents propose drafts. Engineers review diffs, run checks, and decide whether a change meets the project's standards and risk bar before merge. Speed without judgment is not the goal.
How do you keep agents on-pattern for a project?
We encode goals, invariants, stack boundaries, and acceptance criteria in project rules and repo context. That guidance lives with the code so assisted drafts follow naming, architecture, and delivery standards the team already owns.
Can you help our team adopt Cursor?
Yes. We can assess how your team plans, codes, and reviews, then set up rules, secrets handling, and review gates so Cursor fits safely. We also deliver full programs where Cursor shortens cycle time under senior architecture and review.
Which kinds of work benefit most?
Multi-file features, scaffolding, refactors, test stubs, integration research, and documentation drafts benefit most when constraints are clear. Ambiguous product decisions and high-risk production changes stay with human ownership.
The People Leading Your Work
Gabriel RichardsFounder and CEOSince 2000
Roberto OlmosChief Technology OfficerSince 2004
Cheyne PhillipsChief Operating OfficerSince 2014
Jonathan AndersonChief Solutions OfficerSince 2017
Guides from Our Engineers
We Run Our Agency on MCP
Building an AI Support Workflow with a Remote MCP Server: A Production Case Study
How long does an AI automation workflow take to implement?
- 4.9 / 534 Clutch reviews
- Since 2000experience that compounds
- 300+clients served


















