RAG Development Services
Answers grounded in the content your team already trusts
Retrieval-augmented generation connects a language model to your manuals, policies, product data, and ticket history so replies cite real sources instead of guessing.
We design corpora, chunking, permissions, and evaluation sets so staff can trust answers as content changes.
This page covers internal knowledge and staff assistants. For shopper-facing product discovery on your storefront, see AI conversational search.
- 4.9 / 534 Clutch reviews
- Since 2000experience that compounds
- 300+clients served
















How RAG Produces a Grounded Answer
When generic chatbots and static search stop answering real questions
Scattered knowledge
Answers without sources
Permission boundaries
Evaluation gaps
Stale retrieval
Beyond FAQ chatbots
Corpus, retrieval, and evaluation before models go live
Corpus and intent review
Chunking and metadata
Retrieval architecture
Evaluation and rollout
Platforms and patterns under expert judgment
MCP and governed tools
AI agent orchestration
Database-driven web apps
RAG and Knowledge Programs


The People Leading Your Work
Gabriel RichardsFounder and CEOSince 2000
Roberto OlmosChief Technology OfficerSince 2004
Cheyne PhillipsChief Operating OfficerSince 2014
Jonathan AndersonChief Solutions OfficerSince 2017
You can count on us.
Firm Price
The price we quote for a scope of work is the price you pay. No surprises.
Detailed Plan
Visual and written plans make clear the scope of work and guide the project to success.
Steady Cadence
Progress and working decisions arrive on an agreed, dependable rhythm.
Prompt Communication
Questions and issues are acknowledged promptly, with clear ownership and next steps.
Orchestration, MCP, data applications, and custom software.
AI agent orchestration
MCP servers
AI conversational search
Custom software development
Frequently Asked Questions
What is RAG?
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) answers a question by finding relevant passages in your approved content, then asking a language model to draft a reply that cites those sources. It is how assistants stay grounded in manuals, policies, product data, and support history instead of general training data alone.
RAG or fine-tuning?
Fine-tuning changes model behavior; RAG keeps answers tied to documents you control and can update. Most business knowledge systems start with RAG because citations, permissions, and refresh cycles map to how teams already govern content. Fine-tuning may help later for tone or format, but it does not replace authoritative sources.
Which content sources can it use?
Common sources include CMS pages, PDFs and office files, wikis, PIM or product catalogs, ticketing history, and internal databases exposed through APIs. We map what is authoritative for each audience, then build ingestion and chunking that respect how your team publishes and archives content.
How do you keep answers accurate?
We maintain evaluation sets of real questions, check that citations point to the right passages, and review failures with your subject-matter experts. Retrieval is re-run when sources change, and we tune chunking and metadata when answers drift. Human review stays in the loop for high-risk topics.
How do permissions work?
Retrieval runs with the same identity and roles your staff already use. Partner, customer, and internal corpora stay separated at index time and query time. Agents only see documents their login is allowed to read, and audit logs show which sources informed each answer.
What does a first phase look like?
A first phase targets one audience and a bounded set of sources, such as a product line, a policy library, or a support queue. We agree on golden questions, wire retrieval and citations, and run a pilot with logging and review before expanding corpora or channels.
Last updated: October 20, 2026
